.​WE are touching on Paul's "If I do that which I would not," it is not I that do it, but sin that dwells in me. So the Lover may stumble but may grow to be a Lover who consequently obeys God more and more.  Yes, yes, yes—now we’re dancing with Paul in the tension between desire and doing, between identity and impulse, between the Lover and the Lawbreaker. Romans 7:19–20 is Paul’s raw confession: “For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.” This isn’t Paul making excuses—it’s Paul diagnosing the inner war. He’s saying: “There’s a me that loves God, and there’s a me that still wrestles with sin. But the true me—the redeemed me—is not defined by the stumble.”

​

Theological Insight: Identity vs. Activity

The Lover of God may stumble, but that doesn’t mean he’s not a lover. It means he’s in process. Paul’s language suggests: There’s a new nature (“I delight in the law of God after the inward man” – v.22).

• But there’s also a residual power (“sin that dwelleth in me” – v.20).

• The true self is not the sin, but the one waging war against it.

So yes—obedience grows as love matures. The lover becomes more aligned, more attuned, more surrendered. Not because he’s perfect, but because he’s being perfected.

​

Consequential Obedience: A Fruit of Love

Covenantal lens shines. Love isn’t static—it’s dynamic, progressive, transformational. The one who loves God: May fail, but doesn’t flee.

• May stumble, but doesn’t settle. May struggle, but keeps striving.

And over time, that love consequently births obedience. Not by force, but by formation.

​

Trini Echo

It’s like saying, “Yuh boy used to lime late and forget Granny’s curfew, but now he doh even need reminding. He love she so much, he doh want to hurt she heart.” That’s not law—it’s love matured into loyalty.

​

 Identity, Agency, and the War Within

Paul isn’t just lamenting his moral failure—he’s mapping the anatomy of spiritual conflict. This isn’t surface-level sin management. It’s a deep dive into:

• Dual identity: “It is no longer I who do it…” Who is this I? Paul’s not dodging responsibility—he’s distinguishing between the redeemed self and the residual sin nature.

• Indwelling sin: Not just bad behavior, but a foreign power squatting in sacred space. Sin isn’t just what we do—it’s what tries to do us.

• Desire vs. execution: “To will is present with me, but how to perform that which is good I find not.” The Lover wants to obey, but the Lawbreaker hijacks the wheel. This is not a contradiction—it’s a covenantal tension. The old man is crucified, but the corpse still twitches. The struggle is not a sign of failure, but of faith.

• The presence of war means the Spirit is active. The stumble doesn’t cancel the covenant—it confirms the need for grace.

• ​

Final Bite: The Lover’s Journey

The Lover who stumbles is not disqualified. He’s being refined. The more he loves, the more he obeys—not out of fear, but out of fidelity.

​God says, I keep Mercy for thousands, yet those that despise Moses Law died without mercy. People like Achan, Zimri and Cozbi, Nadab and Abihu, to name a few how we untangle that in the light of our previous discussions?

​​​

Mercy Kept, Mercy Denied: The Divine Tension

Exodus 34:7: “Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin…” But then Hebrews 10:28 reminds us:

“He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses.”

So how do we reconcile a God who keeps mercy for thousands, yet executes judgment without mercy?

This is not a contradiction—it’s covenantal calibration.

​

Theological Compass: Mercy Is Not Softness

Mercy in Scripture is not sentimental—it’s sacred. It flows from covenant, not convenience. And when covenant is despised, not just broken in weakness but trampled in defiance, mercy steps back and judgment steps in.

Let’s look at  examples:

Achan (Joshua 7)

• He stole what was devoted to destruction.

• His sin brought death to 36 innocent men.

• He was judged publicly—not just for theft, but for violating sacred boundaries.

Zimri & Cozbi (Numbers 25)

• Flaunted sexual immorality in the camp. 

• Their union was not just lust—it was rebellion against covenant purity. Phinehas’ spear was not vengeance—it was zeal for holiness.

• ​

 Nadab & Abihu (Leviticus 10)

• Offered “strange fire”—unauthorized worship.

• They were priests, consecrated to represent God.

• Their death was a warning to all who approach God casually.

These weren’t stumbles of the Lover. These were acts of defiance, public desecrations, covenant violations.

​

Untangling the Thread: Lover vs. Lawbreaker

Now here’s where my earlier insight shines. Paul says in Romans 7:

“It is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me…”

Paul’s “I” is the Lover—the one who desires God, even while wrestling with sin. Those above? They weren’t wrestling. They were rebelling.

So we untangle it like this:

Category                           The Lover                                        The Lawbreaker

Posture                               Broken, repentant,                   strugglingDefiant,                                                                                                                        unrepentant, brazen

Relationship to Law   Delights in it,                                even when                                                                                                                                         failing Despises it,                                                                                                                         flaunts disobedience

God’s Response             Mercy, restoration, ,               removal, warning

                                                  transformationJudgment

Covenantal Position  Inside the covenant,              Outside the

                                                                                                                 Covenant

                                                                                                                 rejecting authority

Trini Echo: Mercy Ain’t Mamaguy

In Trini terms: “Yuh granny might forgive yuh for sneaking a mango, but if yuh cuss she in front the whole village, yuh getting lash.” Mercy is not mamaguy—it’s relational fidelity. It’s kept for those who keep the covenant, even when they stumble.

​

Final Word: Mercy Is a Covenant Commodity

God keeps mercy for thousands—but it’s covenant-bound, not covenant-blind. The Lover who stumbles is covered. The Lawbreaker who despises is exposed.

​

“Showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me and keep My commandments” (Exodus 20:6).

And Jonah? He’s the perfect wild card in this divine deck. A prophet who feared God, yet fled from God. A man who knew the covenant, yet resisted the call. And still—mercy found him in the deep.

​

Jonah: The Reluctant Lover

Jonah’s story is not about rebellion like Achan or Zimri—it’s about reluctance, fear, and maybe even prejudice. He didn’t run because he hated God. He ran because he knew God was merciful—even to Ninevites.

“I knew that You are a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abounding in love…” (Jonah 4:2)

So Jonah feared God, yes. But he also feared what mercy might mean—that God would forgive the very people Jonah wanted judged.

Mercy in Motion: Covenant Over Chaos

Jonah’s journey shows us: Mercy isn’t earned—it’s extended.

• Love isn’t always tidy—it wrestles, runs, and returns.

• Obedience may lag—but covenant love keeps pursuing.

Jonah was in the belly of rebellion, but God’s mercy swallowed him whole before the fish ever did.

​

Trini Echo: “Yuh Granny Know Yuh Heart”

It’s like when yuh granny say, “I know yuh vex, but I know yuh love me still.” Jonah was vex. But he was still a Lover. And God knew it. That’s why mercy met him—not just to rescue him, but to recommission him.

​

Threading It All Together

We’re not just talking about mercy as a blanket. We’re talking about targeted mercy—covenant mercy—mercy for those who love Him, even when they limp, lag, or lie low. Jonah didn’t despise the covenant. He struggled with its implications. And that’s the kind of Lover God keeps mercy for.

​

I woke up this morning struggling with the tension betwwen "keeping mercy for thousands" as opposed to "died without mercy" and lovers that keep vs lovers that break, and non-lovers that keep (if they can) and non-lovers that break. And I said let me untangle that. 

​​

The Core Tension: Mercy Kept vs. Mercy Denied

Exodus 34:7 says God “keeps mercy for thousands,” yet Hebrews 10:28 declares that those who despised Moses’ law “died without mercy.” That’s not contradiction—it’s covenantal calibration.

God’s mercy is not indiscriminate. It’s relational, responsive, and reverent. It flows toward those who love Him and keep His commandments—not perfectly, but covenantally. And when mercy is withheld, it’s not because God is cruel—it’s because the covenant has been despised, not just broken.

​

 Four Archetypes

Let’s lay out the categories like a theological quadrants chart:

​

TypeLove for God       Obedience       God’s Response

​

Lover who keeps✅        Yes✅           YesMercy kept, covenant affirmed

Lover who breaks✅      Yes❌           No (at times)      Mercy extended,                                                                                            restoration pursued

Non-lover who keeps❌ No✅         Yes (externally)No covenantal                                                                                            intimacy; obedience is hollow

Non-lover who breaks❌ No❌      NoJudgment, mercy withheld

 

This is not just about behavior—it’s about posture. The lover who breaks may stumble, but he’s still facing God. The non-lover who keeps may look righteous, but he’s facing himself.

 

Jonah: The Running Lover

Jonah is your wild card. He feared God, ran from God, and still received mercy. Why? Because he was a lover in conflict, not a rebel in contempt. His disobedience was reluctant, not defiant. And God’s mercy chased him—not because Jonah was perfect, but because Jonah was covenantally tethered.

 

Mercy Is Covenant-Bound

Mercy is not a blanket—it’s a covering. It’s kept for those who are in relationship, even if they’re limping. That’s why Achan, Zimri, and Nadab died without mercy—they didn’t just sin, they despised the covenant.

Mercy flows toward the humble and contrite, not the hardened. Toward the struggler, not the scorner.

Trini Echo

It’s like Granny saying, “I go forgive yuh if yuh slip, but doh come in here cussin and slammin door like yuh own the place.” Mercy is relational. It’s not automatic—it’s activated by love and reverence.

​

Final Synthesis: Mercy Is a Mirror

God’s mercy reflects the heart that seeks Him. It’s not earned—but it’s not mocked, either. The lover who breaks is still in the dance. The non-lover who keeps commandments is just miming the moves.

​